Next: Further Properties of Regular
Up: REGULAR LANGUAGES
Previous: Constructing a DFA from
  Contents
Since we are interested in translating a DFA into a program, we will
want to ensure that this program is as efficient as possible. In
automata terms, one aspect of this will be to ensure that the
constructed DFA has as few states as possible. This is achieved by an
algorithm known as DFA minimisation.
We take the ``optimistic'' approach: we start by assuming that all
states are actually the same, and only distinguish those which we can
prove are different. As for subset construction, the states of the
minimised DFA will be sets of states from the original DFA; these will
be states that we couldn't tell apart!
Two states are different if:
- one is a final state and the other isn't, or
- the transition function maps them to different states, based on the
same input character
We base our algorithm on partitioning the states using this criterion.
- Initially start with two sets of states: the final, and the
non-final states.
- For each state-set created by the previous iteration, examine
the transitions for each state and each input symbol. If they go to a
different state-set for any two states, then these should be put into
different state-sets for the next iteration.
- We are finished when an iteration creates no new state-sets.
Next: Further Properties of Regular
Up: REGULAR LANGUAGES
Previous: Constructing a DFA from
  Contents
James Power
2002-11-29